Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) vs Blink Video Doorbell (2nd Gen)

The Blink Video Doorbell (2nd Gen), on a battery rated up to two years against about four months, a lower price and customizable motion zones included. The Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) wins on 2K video, platform support and alert variety.

Up to two years per charge against roughly four months for the Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen). That is the difference between changing batteries twice a decade and three times a year.

The Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen), which records true 2K video in a tall square format that shows a visitor head to toe, including parcels on the step. The Blink Video Doorbell (2nd Gen) records at a lower resolution.

The Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) requires a subscription for customizable motion zones. The Blink Video Doorbell (2nd Gen) includes them, which matters on a doorbell facing a pavement or road.

The Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen), which supports Google Home and Home Assistant alongside Alexa and IFTTT. The Blink Video Doorbell (2nd Gen) is limited to Alexa and IFTTT.

Buyers who want the sharpest image, Google Home or Home Assistant support and alerts that separate animals, packages, people and vehicles, and who accept recharging every few months.

Buyers in an Alexa home who want the cheapest doorbell here, motion zones included, and a battery that lasts up to two years between changes.