Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) vs Eufy Video Doorbell S220

The Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) wins overall on price, wider integrations and richer alerts. The Eufy Video Doorbell S220 is better rated, lasts longer on a charge and skips subscriptions with local storage, so it is the pick if you value battery life and no fees over object recognition.

Storage and hub needs. The Eufy Video Doorbell S220 records locally with no subscription but requires a Eufy HomeBase, while the Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) is standalone but has no local storage and needs Arlo Secure for cloud video and smart alerts.

The Eufy Video Doorbell S220, rated around 6 months per charge (often longer in normal traffic), against the Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) at roughly 4 months. Both can also be hardwired for constant power.

The Eufy does, with a caveat. The Eufy Video Doorbell S220 stores video locally on a required Eufy HomeBase with no monthly fee. The Arlo Video Doorbell 2K (2nd gen) has no local storage, so viewing history and running its smart alerts require an Arlo Secure plan.

Buyers who want wider platform support (Google, Alexa, Home Assistant, IFTTT), person, package, vehicle and animal detection, and a lower price, and who accept paying for Arlo Secure. It is the more connected doorbell for households that live with the fee.

Owners who want subscription-free, locally stored 2K video with long battery life and proven durability, and who already have or will add a Eufy HomeBase. Just note the two-way audio is laggy and it is not a standalone doorbell.