NAS · Head to head

QNAP TS-462A-4G vs Ubiquiti UNAS Pro

Full NAS comparison in 2026

Updated October 2026
Data from Amazon and official QNAP and Ubiquiti sites.
2026 verdict
QNAP TS-462A-4G is the more complete option versus Ubiquiti UNAS Pro in 2026, helped most by processor, storage, and apps & virtualization.
What pushes it ahead is processor, storage, and apps & virtualization, and its broader overall balance keeps the advantage from looking narrow. There is still a case for Ubiquiti UNAS Pro, but mainly if rating and memory capacity are what you value most. For most setups, QNAP TS-462A-4G is the smarter buy.
vs
News by email

Still comparing? Get what's new by email

New releases and the smart home news worth knowing, in your inbox.

Smart home news and new releases, straight to your inbox

New releases, comparisons and the smart home news worth knowing.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Please enter a valid email address.
Tick the box above to finish signing up.
We couldn't verify you're human. Please try again.
Too many attempts. Please try again in an hour.
Your subscription has been successful.
FeatureQNAP TS-462A-4GUbiquiti UNAS ProWinner
Rating4.85.0Ubiquiti UNAS Pro
ProcessorHardware Transcoding, Hardware Encryption EngineNoneQNAP TS-462A-4G
Memory Capacity4 GB8 GBUbiquiti UNAS Pro
StorageHot Swappable, M.2 as Storage Pool, Expansion Unit SupportHot SwappableQNAP TS-462A-4G
Apps & VirtualizationDocker Containers, Virtual Machines, Plex Media Server, Surveillance App, AI Photo RecognitionNoneQNAP TS-462A-4G
NetworkWake on LANNoneTie
Winner
Prime exclusive deal
$529.00
  • + Processor: Hardware Transcoding, Hardware Encryption Engine
  • + Storage: Hot Swappable, M.2 as Storage Pool, Expansion Unit Support
  • + Apps & Virtualization: Docker Containers, Virtual Machines, Plex Media Server, Surveillance App, AI Photo Recognition
  • - Rating: 4.8 vs 5.0
  • - Memory Capacity: 4 GB vs 8 GB
Prime exclusive deal
Currently unavailable on Amazon USA
  • + Rating: 5.0
  • + Memory Capacity: 8 GB
  • - Processor: None vs Hardware Transcoding, Hardware Encryption Engine
  • - Storage: Hot Swappable vs Hot Swappable, M.2 as Storage Pool, Expansion Unit Support

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall: QNAP TS-462A-4G or Ubiquiti UNAS Pro?

QNAP TS-462A-4G has the stronger overall profile in this comparison, especially for processor, storage, and apps & virtualization.

What is the biggest difference between QNAP TS-462A-4G and Ubiquiti UNAS Pro?

Rating is one of the clearest differences: QNAP TS-462A-4G lists 4.8, while Ubiquiti UNAS Pro lists 5.0.

Who should buy QNAP TS-462A-4G?

Choose QNAP TS-462A-4G if your priority is processor and storage and that matters more than rating.

Who should buy Ubiquiti UNAS Pro?

Choose Ubiquiti UNAS Pro if your priority is rating and memory capacity and that matters more than processor.

Full comparison table

Compare all 38 NAS side by side

You are looking at two of them. The full table lines up all NAS in the catalog with the same specs, so you can filter by what you need and sort by price or rating.

  • 38 NAS
  • 61 specs compared
  • 58 filters
Open the full comparison
More NAS

Top NAS to compare next

38 NAS devices from UGREEN, Synology and Ubiquiti compared: bays, CPU, RAM, RAID levels, network ports, app ecosystems and prices, side by side.

All NAS
QNAP

More QNAP products

A sharper look at other QNAP products worth comparing.

Explore QNAP
Ubiquiti

More Ubiquiti products

A sharper look at other Ubiquiti products worth comparing.

Explore Ubiquiti