WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR341 vs WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320

For a flat, large lawn the WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 is the better value, and the WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR341 is the stronger machine on difficult ground. The WR320 covers more grass and runs longer; the WR341 adds four-wheel drive and an 84% slope rating.

Neither does. Both take RTK corrections over the internet and map the lawn with stereo Vision AI, so nothing is buried or mounted in the garden. The boundary and no-go areas live in the app.

The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR341 climbs to 84%, about 40 degrees, with its four driven wheels. The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 drives two wheels and is rated to 30%, about 17 degrees, so it is the wrong choice for steep ground.

The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR341, which ships with the Cut-to-Zero offset blade module that trims to a fixed border. The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 follows borders with its cameras but its Cut-to-Zero module is sold separately.

The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 at roughly 27.6 lb, against about 37.3 lb for the WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR341. The extra weight of the 4WD model is the price of its traction hardware.

Buy the WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 for a flat or gently rolling half acre with no steep banks. Buy the WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR341 only when the garden is sloped or uneven and needs the four-wheel-drive traction.