WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 vs WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320

The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 for a flat or gently rolling half-acre lawn, because it shares the same cloud RTK and vision navigation, runs about 60 minutes per charge and costs less. The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 is the better mower for steep or uneven ground, where its four driven wheels and 84% slope rating are the reason to pay more.

Traction. The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 is all-wheel drive with front-wheel steering and an 84% slope rating, while the WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 is two-wheel drive rated for 30%. Both use the same RTK cloud positioning, V-SLAM vision and antenna-free mapping.

Neither needs a perimeter wire or a reference antenna. Both take RTK corrections from the WORX cloud and fall back on stereo-camera V-SLAM under trees, mapping the lawn automatically and accepting unlimited zones and app-drawn no-go areas.

The WORX Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 runs about 60 minutes per charge against roughly 41 on the 4WD WR342. Both use a 5 Ah PowerShare battery that recharges in about 100 minutes and can be swapped, since it is shared with the wider WORX cordless range.

Owners of a half-acre lawn without steep banks who want the least expensive route into cloud RTK, V-SLAM vision, automatic mapping and a swappable battery, and who can live with a 30% slope ceiling and no light module.

Anyone with a half-acre garden of steep banks, raised borders and uneven ground who needs four driven wheels, an 84% slope rating and a Cut-to-Zero edge module, and who accepts a shorter runtime and separately sold lights.